By: Raven
Bart, I see you missed by “Primum non nocere” reference. That is the latin for the warning given doctors called ‘first, do no harm’. i.e. doctors are told that given uncertainty about the course of a...
View ArticleBy: Raven
Bart, 1) I feel it is wrong to assume that CO2 sensitivity is a constant and there is no reason to believe that the sensitivity observed during the ice ages is the same as today. There are simply too...
View ArticleBy: Bart
Raven, How would your opinion on what can or cannot be done about the problem influence your diagnosis of the problem? It shouldn’t, right? It is probably a very human trait, but the physical climate...
View ArticleBy: Raven
Bart, You are medical analogies are completely in appropriate. A more appropriate one is a doctor telling a patient who shows no symptoms that lab experiments on rats suggest the patient might develop...
View ArticleBy: Raven
Hank, You are projecting again. Don’t you have some lead on big oil/big coal donation to a think tank that is loosely connected to someone vaguely connect to Dr. Curry that shows she is has been bought...
View ArticleBy: Hengist McStone
Apropos the original posting, I’d like to add it’s pretty clear that there’s a disconnect between what the scientists know and what the media are reporting to us further down the information food...
View ArticleBy: MikeN
Tom is right when he talks about how people evaluate credibility. When a scientist (Mann et al 2007) uses data upside down, that makes the guy look incompetent, maybe he shouldn’t be believed. The same...
View ArticleBy: Gavin Schmidt and Judith Curry on Science Advocacy by Dr. Bart Verheggen
[…] broader political objectives that support any/all of the above: This goes more likely in the direction of downplaying rather than overplaying AGW I would argue. […]
View ArticleBy: FORUM REPORT 01
[…] broader political objectives that support any/all of the above: This goes more likely in the direction of downplaying rather than overplaying AGW I would argue. […]
View Article
